Why is the US government so eager to kill its citizens?

The recent shooting of an American Citizen LaVoy Finicum in the US by the FBI highlights a very American problem: the apparent eagerness of its federal agents and police forces to kill American citizens.

This is not some slight or marginal phenomenon. The sheer scale of the killing, the rate at which Americans are gunned down by their own police beggars belief, as does the apparent willingness of American citizens to put up with it.
The excellent article below compares for example just one person shot by the police in the England in 2014 with OVER A THOUSAND shot by American cops.

If American cops were killing their citizens at the same rate as English  cops, by my reckoning they should have killed about 7 in 2014. They killed 150 times that many!

If we take two years, 2013 and 2014 for our comparison we have still just the one police killing in England (the cops shot dead nobody in 2013) against just under 1900 in the USA!

By way of another example, Americas attacked and devastated Iraq and Afghanistan, killing, terrorising or otherwise upsetting tens of thousands of the citizens of those countries. In retaliation, how many Americans did the people of those countries kill in 2014? The answer is 58. 

Even suicides among active military personnel killed more than the Muslims did (288) so a big round of applause there for the idiot who let the demented loons of psychiatry loose with their medications upon unsuspecting servicemen. 

In other words, though, two countries supposedly chock full of bloodthirsty, crazed  - and no doubt VERY pissed off - Muslims who want nothing more from life than the chance to kill Americans (if you swallow the propaganda tripe for one second) could only kill 58 Americans, whilst back home the army occupying America killed about twenty times as many natives. So clearly the Mussims were not trying anywhere near as hard as the cops, or were less well armed or something.

In light of the unrest in America and what appears to be the simmering of outright revolt as that country is managed to destruction by its own elite, the killing of another citizen by the FBI in Oregon would appear to be a dreadful error that the American government will come to regret.

My own view is that these things are not errors. They are provocations geared to driving more divisive wedges into the American community, pursuant to the agendum of cultural destruction.

The masterminds of cultural destruction, the enemies of America and the West are not "over there" in some foreign county. THEY ARE AT HOME and no amount of putting the boot in on foreigners will defeat them. They are subversives who have infiltrated or found collaborators within so many corridors and offices of the establishment.

The destruction has spread like a cancer or virus into so many organs and sinews of the nation the malaise threatens to become terminal unless the American people do something effective to defend their culture.

And, no, bullying or beating up Muslims won't cut it because Muslims ain't the ones busy sabotaging America's economy, political establishment, moral standards, education, jurisprudence, mental health and so on and so forth.

Who, dear patriot,  is the bigger enemy of the people? The Afghan or Iraqi who kill 58 Americans (and virtually none on American soil), the psychs whose brain-damaging drugs killed 288, or the feds and cops who killed 1100?

For example - and one germane to the phenomenon of police slaughter of the residents of the erstwhile land of the free - maybe someone could pull a string and find out who is the clown pushing for training American cops in Israel?

Israel, in case you had not noticed, runs an army of occupation and brutally suppresses the natives if they get uppity. The Israeli army of occupation is NOT where you want to train your domestic police force! Unless, that is, you want to wind up with a police force that acts like and sees itself as an army of occupation giving brutally short shrift to restless and recalcitrant natives.

Police in the US Kill Citizens at Over 70 Times the Rate of Other First-World Nations
It is becoming quite clear that police in the US can and will kill people, even unarmed people, even on video, and do so with impunity.

The tallying methods, or rather lack thereof, used by both the FBI and individual police departments to count the amount of people killed by police, have been shown to be staggeringly inaccurate.

However, this inability of the government to count the number of people it kills, has been met with multiple alternative means of calculating just how deadly the state actually is.

One of these citizen run databases, is the website www.killedbypolice.com. The site is basically a spreadsheet that lists every person killed by cops in the years 2013 and 2014. In addition to naming those killed, it also provides a link to media reports for each of the killings, age, sex and race if available.

The tally for 2014? 1,100 people killed by those sworn to protect. That is an average of three people a day.

Do not mistake this as saying that those who were killed were innocent. However, when we look at violent crime in this country, we can see that it is at an all time low.

While violence among citizens has dropped, violence against citizens carried out by police has been rising sharply.

When we look at citizens killed by police over the last two years, deaths have increased 44 percent in this short time; 763 people were killing by police in 2013.

As a comparison, the total number of US troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq, in 2014 was 58.

Fewer soldiers were killed in war than citizens back home in “the land of the free” in 2014, by a large margin.

So why is that?

Is this some natural tendency of police in “free societies” to kill their citizens more, in an effort to maintain this freedom? Hardly, and hardly is the US a free country.

According to the 2014 Legatum Prosperity Index released in November, in the measure of personal freedom, the United States has fallen from 9th place in 2010 to 21st worldwide—behind such countries as Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Uruguay and Costa Rica.

Other such rankings systems show the US as low as 46.

Let’s look at our immediate neighbors to the north, Canada. The total number of citizens killed by law enforcement officers in the year 2014, was 14; that is 78 times less people than the US.

If we look at the United Kingdom, 1 person was killed by police in 2014 and 0 in 2013. English police reportedly fired guns a total of three times in all of 2013, with zero reported fatalities.

From 2010 through 2014, there were four fatal police shootings in England, which has a population of about 52 million. By contrast, Albuquerque, N.M., with a population 1 percent the size of England’s, had 26 fatal police shootings in that same time period.

China, whose population is 4 and 1/2 times the size of the United States, recorded 12 killings by law enforcement officers in 2014.

Let that sink in. Law enforcement in the US killed 92 times more people than a country with nearly 1.4 billion people.

It doesn’t stop there.

From 2013-2014, German police killed absolutely no one.

In the entire history of Iceland police, they have only killed 1 person ever. After exhausting all non-lethal methods to detain an armed man barricaded in his house who actually shot 2 police officers, police were forced to take the 59-year-old man’s life. The country of Iceland grieved for weeks after having to resort to violence.

So why are police in the US so much more likely to kill than all of these other first world countries?

To better understand the multi-dimensional answer to that question, we can start by looking at the prison population of the US.

America imprisons almost twenty five percent of all people imprisoned in the world, although containing only about 5% of the worlds population, an extremely disproportionate share of people imprisoned globally.

The U.S. houses 2.3 million inmates, while China, a country with four times the population of the U.S., is a distant second with 1.6 million prisoners.

The war on drugs coupled with the military industrial state created by the US playing police of the world, has created a deadly combination.

A constant pursuit of new weaponry by the military has paved the way for the hand-me-down cycle of military gear to police departments.

The idea was that if the U.S. wanted its police to act like drug warriors, it should equip them like warriors, which it has—to the tune of around $4.3 billion in equipment, according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union.

What we are calling the militarization of of police has already taken place, on a large scale. We are now seeing a domestic military, pretending to be a police force.

The time for peaceful resistance is now and more and more people are beginning to understand this.

Even retired police chiefs of large cities are watching from the sidelines with anxiety as they see their once, only slightly corrupt cities, turn into occupied militarized zones, ready to pounce on the first instance of civil opposition.

The most recent of former police chiefs coming to terms with the horrid consequences of their actions is Norm Stamper, former chief of the Seattle Police. Stamper was recently on the Colbert Report and Stephen Colbert asked him what happened during the infamous Seattle WTO protests in 1999 under his leadership. “Well we gassed non-threatening, non-violent protesters,” replied the former Chief of police for Seattle Washington.

Of course while Norm Stamper was a cop, he didn’t realize that his actions, no matter how “justified” by the state, would be contributing to a hellish future police state. Stamper, like myself a 4 year veteran of the USMC, and most of those who serve, or have served the state in some way, are unable to think outside of the paradigm while simultaneously supporting it.


“Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service.” -Two time medal of honor recipient General Smedley Butler, USMC

Because Stamper is out of the paradigm, he can see clearer now. According to his website, he wants to:

End the Drug War… Drive Bigotry and Brutality Out of the Criminal Justice System… Honor the Constitution… Build Respect for Cops…

So far, Stamper has been quite outspoken against the police state of which he was once complicit in creating. In order to affect change more people like Stamper need to come out. If half of the officers that contacted the Free Thought Project spoke publicly about their concerns, we’d be in a much better place.

Unfortunately when officers do speak out against their own department they are met with horrid backlash from their peers.

The Free Thought Project is contacted regularly by police officers who know the system they uphold is completely corrupt, but they find it nearly impossible to call out the corruption.

Most recently an officer in Texas contacted us, who wanted to help prevent brutality and corruption. When we told him that speaking out and refusing to enforce immoral laws is how to change things, he replied by stating that he does refuse to arrest people for marijuana possession, but that he “fear(s) the repercussions by speaking out, simply because I do need a paycheck.”

When police fear the police, it is high time for change.

The overwhelming majority of police brutality cases stem from the war on drugs. When so many people are tasked with finding and prosecuting those in possession of a substance deemed illegal, the interactions become more frequent and less cordial. If we end that, we get the state out of the private lives of most individuals. This will only serve to lessen the scope of police harassment, in turn lessening the instance of brutality and killings.

The Free Thought Project is currently planning a world wide day of peaceful resistance to #End the Drug War.

We are also starting a Go Fund Me campaign to help support whistleblower police officers. With enough ‘good cops’ coming out against corruption in their departments, this would help to speed up the awakening process for Americans who still support the police state.

We’ve seen the change that one or two good cops can effect, imagine 100.

The time for peaceful action is now.

The article was published by the good people at the superb Global Research

Its original source is The Free Thought Project